Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development
Vol 5 (2020): March
Village Development Articles

Kobhung and Symbols of Power the Husband in Madura (Panoptisisme Study on Behavior Wife Husband Facing Domination)
Kobhung Dan Simbol Kekuasaan Suami Di Madura (Studi Panoptisisme Tentang Perilaku Istri Suami yang Mendominasi)


View Article
  • Atiqullah Atiqullah*,
  • Syaiful Hadi
Atiqullah Atiqullah
State Islamic Institute Of Madura, Indonesia *
Syaiful Hadi
State Islamic Institute Of Madura, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v5i0.146
Published March 23, 2020
Keywords
  • Kobhung,
  • Taneyan Lanjhang,
  • Panopticon
How to Cite
Atiqullah, A., & Hadi, S. (2020). Kobhung and Symbols of Power the Husband in Madura (Panoptisisme Study on Behavior Wife Husband Facing Domination). Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 5, 10.21070/ijccd.v5i1.146. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v5i0.146

Copyright (c) 2020 Atiqullah Atiqullah, Syaiful Hadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

 First, this study discusses the settlement in the form taneyan lanjhang, namely “kobhung” located at the western end (qibla) not only serves as a center of activity for men namely the transfer of religious values to the next generation, but also a symbol of supervision and control (Panopticon) out of the family members. Second, women in villages Madura can not escape from adhandhan, arembi ', and amassa' (self-care, childbirth or caring for the family, and cooking) as a form of devotion to her husband and family. With this condition, they did not sue even accept gracefully about his role in the household, because it has been taught for generations.

 

View Article

References

  1. L. Abu-Lughod, Writing Women’s Worlds: Bedouin Stories. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
  2. A. Ali, A. Muhdlor, and Zuhdi, “Kamus kontem- porer Arab – Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Multi Karya Grafika Pondok Pesantren Krapyak, 1998.” 1998.
  3. K. Ali, I. D. Nafisah, and null Jahrotul, “Tra- disi Mahar: Pemberian ataukah Pembelian. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2012.” 2012.
  4. A. Subaharianto, “Tantangan industrialisasi madura: Mmbentur kultur, menjujung leluhur.” Bayu Media Publishing, 2004.
  5. A. Aur, “Pascastrukturalisme Michel Foucault dan Dialog Menuju Dialog Antarperadaban”, dalam Teori-teori Kebudayaan,” Mudji Sutrisno dan Hendar Putranto. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2005.
  6. B. P. P. D. Kabupaten and Sumenep, 2009, Kabu- paten Sumenep dalam Angka. Sumenep: Bappeda Sumenap.
  7. K. Bertens and F. B. K. Prancis, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2001.
  8. H. Blackford, ““Playground Panopticism: Ring- around-the-children, A Pocketful of Women”, Childhood, Vol. 11 No. 2 (2004),” 2004.
  9. E. M. Bruner, “Kerabat dan Bukan Kerabat,” Pokok- pokok Antropologi Budaya. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1996.
  10. ——, “The Expression of Ethnicity in Indonesia,” in dalam Urban Ethnicity. Abner Cohen, 1973.
  11. Budiman, 2011, Mahar dalam Pandangan Khaled Abou El-Fadl. Thesis UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
  12. M. Burton, C. Moore, J. Whiting, and K. Rom- ney, “Regions Based on Social Structure”,” Current Anthropology, vol. 37, no. 87, 1996.
  13. T. W. Christ, “Scientific-based Research and Ran- domized Controlled Trials, the “Gold” Standard? Alternative Paradigms and Mixed Methodologies,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 1, 2014.
  14. S. R. Clegg, Frameworks of power. London: Sage, 1989.
  15. A. Dahlan and null Aziz, “ Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam, jilid III. Jakarta: PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2001.” 2001.
  16. C. Dandeker and Surveillance, Power and Moder- nity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
  17. P. Davies, The American Heritage Dictionary of The English Language. New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc, 1977.
  18. M. Das, Makalah dipresentasikan pada The Inter- national Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), Salvador, Brazil, 2001, Konferensi Umum ke-24.
  19. F. Eggan, Social Organization of the Western Pueb- los. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
  20. J. L. Esposito, D. Delong-Bas, and J. Natana, “Women in Muslim,” Family Law, vol. 19, no. 2, 2001.
  21. Fairchild, Dictionary of Sociology and Related Sci- ences. New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc, 1966.
  22. B. L. Foster, “Continuity and Change in Rural Thai Family Structure,” Journal of Anthropplogical Research, no. 31, 1975.
  23. M. . P. Foucault, Rabinow, and London, “The Ethics of the Concern for the Self as a Practice of Freedom,” Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Essential Works of Foucault, vol. 1, 1954.
  24. M. . . Foucault, H. L. D. Dreyfus, M. Rabinow, and null Foucault, “The Subject and Power (After- word),” in Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics.University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  25. M. Foucault, “The Subject and Power”, dalam Power: Essential Works of Foucault,” J. Faubion, vol. 3, 1954.
  26. M. Foucault and Power/Knowledge, “Selected inter- views and other writings by michel foucault,” C. G. ., Ed. Pantheon, 1972.
  27. M. Foucault, The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin Books, 1998, vol. 1.
  28. R. Fox, Kinship, Marriage, and Harmondsworth. Middlesex: Penguin, 1967.
  29. M. Gallagher, “Producing the Schooled Subject: Techniques of Power in a Primary School, (Edin- burgh: The University of Edinburgh Press, 2004.” 2004.
  30. ——, “Are Schools Panoptic?” Surveillance & Soci- ety, vol. 7, 2010.
  31. C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Culture, New York; Basic Book, 1973.
  32. D. Gordon, “The Electronic Panopticon: a Case Study of The Development of the National Crimi- nal Records System,” Politics and Society, vol. 15, no. 4, 1987.
  33. T. Haar, . . Pengantar, S. Dalam, and Poesponoto, 1950.
  34. H. Hadikusuma, H. Waris, and Adat. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.
  35. J. Hadler, S. Tiada, and Putus, M. ., R. I. ., and dan Kolonialisme di Minangkabau ., Eds., Jakarta: Free- dom Institute, 2010.
  36. K. D. Haggerty, D. Ericson, and V. Richard, “The Surveillant Assemblage,” British Journal of Sociol- ogy, no. 51, 2000.
  37. N. Hasan and null Kobung, “ Bangunan Tadisional Pewaris Nilai Masyarakat Madura Tempo Dulu)”, Karsa: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. XIII, No. 1 (April, 2008),” 2008.
  38. M. Hefni and .-G.-R. Bhuppa’-Bhaˆbhu, “Studi Konstruktivisme-Strukturalis tentang Hierarkhi Kepatuhan dalam Budaya Masyarakat Madura”, Karsa: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. XI, No.1 (April, 2007),” 2007.
  39. J. Heng, A. D. Kusuma, and Bayu, “Konsepsi Lang- gar sebagai Ruang Sakral pada Tanean Lanjang,” Jurnal Arsitektur Komposisi, vol. 10, no. 4, 2013.
  40. Hariyatmoko, “Kekuasaan Melahirkan Anti- Kekuasaan: Menelanjangi Mekanisme dan Teknik Kekuasaan Bersama Foucault, Basis, Nomor 01 - 02, tahun ke-51 (Januari – Februari, 2002),” 2002.
  41. M. J. Herskovits, Struktur Masyarakat”, dalam Pokok-pokok Antropologi Budaya, T. I. J. ., Ed. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1996.
  42. J. S. Hirsch and H. D. Wardlow, Modern Loves: The Anthropolofy of Roamtic Courtship and Companion- ate Marriage, Macmillan, 2006.
  43. A. Hope and Panopticism, “Play and the Resistance of Surveillance: Case Studies of the Observation of Student Internet Use in UK Schools,” British Jour- nal of Sociology of Education, vol. 26, no. 3, 2005.
  44. M. H. D. Jonge, . D. E. Zaman, P. Pedagang, D. Ekonomi, and Islam, 1989.
  45. A. Indeswari, “Pola Ruang Bersama pada Permuki- man Madura Medalungan di Dusun Baran Randugading,” Jurnal Ruas, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2013.
  46. H. Johnson, “There are Worse Things Than Being Alone: Polygamy in Islam,” Past, Present, and Future, 2005.
  47. R. Jones, “Polygyny in Islam,” Macalester Islam Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 2006.
  48. C. K. Dan, A Family Cycle Analysis of Family Struc- ture and Fertility. Thailand. Bangkok: Research Center, 1980.
  49. K. M. Kapadia, The Matrilineal Family: Marriage and Family in India. Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1966.
  50. Koentjoroningrat, Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial, 1990.