- Subject-object perception,
- sensory limitations,
- epistemology,
- intellect,
- human perception
Copyright (c) 2024 Kumara Adji Kusuma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The question of whether an object can inform a subject of its inherent nature reveals complexities in the subject-object relationship in perception. Human perception is inherently limited by the physiological structures of the senses, and thus, reality is interpreted rather than directly experienced. For instance, the color orange is not an inherent trait of an object but a perception shaped by the human eye's capacity to detect certain wavelengths of light. Variations in sensory structures across species highlight that other beings may perceive the same object differently; many animals, for instance, have distinct visual and auditory ranges, allowing them to see ultraviolet light or hear frequencies beyond human capacity. This limitation of human senses, however, is often overcome through technology—such as telescopes, microscopes, and specialized audio equipment—enabling insights beyond natural perception. Philosophically, this emphasizes the role of the intellect in compensating for sensory limitations, facilitating a structured understanding of phenomena that are otherwise inaccessible. Different epistemologies, including empiricism and rationalism, debate whether the senses alone or in conjunction with reason reveal truth, while Islamic perspectives emphasize a harmonious relationship between the two, with both seen as essential yet ultimately limited in understanding metaphysical or divine truths. This interplay between sensory perception and intellectual inference demonstrates the intricate processes humans employ to approximate an understanding of reality and its complexities.
Highlights:
-
Perception’s Limits: Senses offer partial, not full, reality.
-
Tech’s Role: Extends perception beyond natural limits.
-
Philosophy’s Insight: Highlights sensory and perceptual boundaries.
Keywords: Subject-object-perception, sensory limitations, epistemology, intellect, human perception
References
- M. F. L. a. D.-E. Nilsson, Animal Eyes. 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- K. A. Kusuma, "An Assessment of Empirical Thinking in Islam," Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 10-21070, (2024).
- I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.
- M. Foucault, . Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Translated by Richard Howard, New York: Vintage Books, 2006.
- W. S. a. R. Rorty, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1997.
- P. Phemister, The Rationalists: Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz, Malden, MA: Polity , 2006.
- I. Sina, The Metaphysics of Healing, Brigham : Brigham Young University Press, 1984.
- Al-Ghazali, Ihya Ulum al-Din [The Revival of the Religious Sciences], Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj, 2004.
- S. M. N. Al-Attas, The Nature of Man and the Psychology of the Human Soul, Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 1993.
- S. H. Nasr, The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity, SanFrancisco: Harper, 2002.