Vol 14 No 2 (2023): June
Disaster Risk Reduction, Resilience, and Community-based Approaches

Green Productivity in Increasing the Productivity of Sugar Cane Farmers and Reducing Impacts on the Environment
Green Productivity dalam Meningkatkan Produktivitas Petani Tebu serta Mengurangi Dampak terhadap Lingkungan


Inggit Marodiyah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *
Hana Catur Wahyuni
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Intan Rohma Nurmalasari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published August 7, 2023
Keywords
  • green productivity,
  • Sugarcane Farming,
  • Cobb-Douglas Analysis,
  • Sustainability,
  • Environmental Impact
How to Cite
Marodiyah, I., Wahyuni, H. C., & Nurmalasari, I. R. (2023). Green Productivity in Increasing the Productivity of Sugar Cane Farmers and Reducing Impacts on the Environment. Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v14i2.954

Abstract

This research aims to improve the productivity and environmental performance of sugarcane farming through sustainable enhancements. Utilizing the Cobb-Douglas method, factors influencing sugarcane farming management and green productivity are identified to reduce environmental impacts. The study highlights the significance of environmental aspects in the agricultural sector and proposes green productivity as a strategy to increase awareness and address land-related environmental concerns. The results show that by implementing green productivity practices, sugarcane productivity can be augmented, management costs reduced, and farmers' income increased, leading to a more sustainable and high-quality agricultural sector.

Highlights:

  • Increased Productivity: Implementing green productivity strategies in sugarcane farming to enhance crop yields and profitability.
  • Sustainable Agriculture: Addressing environmental concerns through eco-friendly practices in sugarcane cultivation for long-term viability.
  • Cobb-Douglas Method: Utilizing a robust analytical approach to identify influential factors and optimize sugarcane farming management.
  Keywords: Green Productivity, Sugarcane Farming, Cobb-Douglas Analysis, Sustainability, Environmental Impact.

References

  1. S. Nurwahidah, D. D. Hadi, Masyhuri, and L. R. Waluyati, “Analisis Kelayakan Usahatani dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produktivitas Jagung pada Lahan Kering di Kecamatan Labangka Kabupaten Sumbawa,” J. Ilmu-Ilmu Pertan., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–127, 2015.
  2. E. Tando, “Review: Peningkatan Produktivitas Tebu (Saccarum Officinarum L.) pada Lahan Kering Melalui Pemanfaatan Bahan Organik dan Bahan Pelembab Tanah Sintesis,” Biotropika - J. Trop. Biol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 90–96, 2017, doi: 10.21776/ub.biotropika.2017.005.03.6.
  3. S. Matsvai, A. Mushunje, and S. Tatsvarei, “Technical efficiency impact of microfinance on small scale resettled sugar cane farmers in Zimbabwe,” Cogent Econ. Financ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.2017599.
  4. R. Hamida and C. Suhara, “Pengaruh Sugarcane Streak Mosaic Virus terhadap Anatomi dan Kadar Klorofil Daun Beberapa Aksesi Tebu (Sacharrum officinarum),” Ber. Biol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi: 10.14203/beritabiologi.v18i1.2288.
  5. G. C. F. Candra, “Analisis Produktivitas Styrofoam Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode Cobb Douglas Di PT KCS,” Ind. Inov. J. Tek. Ind., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2021, doi: 10.36040/industri.v11i2.3694.
  6. A. J. Nugroho and D. Sentoso, “Analisis Risiko Limbah di Lingkungan Pekerja dengan Metode Environmental Risk Analysis Untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Green Productivity,” ULIL ALBAB J. Ilmiah Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 2659–2674, 2022.
  7. S. Gechert, T. Havranek, Z. Irsova, and D. Kolcunova, “Death To the Cobb-Douglas Production Function,” no. 201, pp. 1–50, 2019.
  8. B. Mahaboob, K. A. Ajmath, B. Venkateswarlu, C. Narayana, and J. P. Praveen, “On Cobb-Douglas Production Function Model,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2177, no. November, pp. 1–5, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5135215.