Vol 15 No 1 (2024): March
Community Education Development Articles

Representation of Toxic Messages in Windah Basudara YouTube Content
Representasi Pesan Toxic pada Konten Youtube Windah Basudara


Moch Bima Syaputra Winardi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *
Kukuh Sinduwiatmo
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published March 5, 2024
Keywords
  • YouTube,
  • Toxic Language,
  • Semiotics,
  • Content Analysis,
  • Digital Communication
How to Cite
Winardi , M. B. S., & Sinduwiatmo , K. (2024). Representation of Toxic Messages in Windah Basudara YouTube Content . Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v15i1.1186

Abstract

General Background: YouTube has become a prominent media platform, serving various user needs, including entertainment, information, and profit generation for content creators, commonly known as YouTubers. Specific Background: Among the diverse range of YouTubers, some, like Windah Basudara, have generated controversial content characterized by toxic language and trash talking. Knowledge Gap: Despite the prevalence of toxic messages in online content, there is limited scholarly analysis focusing on how such language is represented and its implications in the context of YouTube. Aims: This study aims to analyze the representation of toxic messages in Windah Basudara's content using Roland Barthes' semiotic analysis framework. Results: Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were extracted from video clips featuring Windah Basudara. The analysis revealed that his use of toxic language serves as an emotional outburst, yet the vocabulary often conflicts with societal language ethics. Novelty: This research contributes to the understanding of the semiotic representation of toxicity in digital content, offering insights into the intersection of emotional expression and ethical communication. Implications: The findings underscore the need for critical engagement with language use in online platforms, which may inform future discussions on content moderation and the impact of YouTube creators on audience perceptions.

Highlights: 

  1. Diverse User Engagement: YouTube serves various audiences, including those seeking entertainment and profit-driven content creators.
  2. Controversial Content: Windah Basudara's use of toxic language exemplifies emotional expression but often violates societal language ethics.
  3. Critical Analysis Importance: The study emphasizes the necessity of understanding toxic language representation to guide discussions on content moderation and creator responsibility.

Keywords: YouTube, Toxic Language, Semiotics, Content Analysis, Digital Communication

 

References

[1] J. Setiadi, E. F., Azmi, A., & Indrawadi, “Youtube sebagai sumber belajar generasi milenial,” J. Civ. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 313–323, 2019.
[2] A. Hariyanto, A., & Putra, “Konten Kreator Youtube Sebagai Sumber Penghasilan (Telaah Kritis Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah),” J. Huk. Ekon. Syariah Dan Kel. Islam, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 243–262, 2022.
[3] D. N. Milenio, “Analisis Resepsi Terhadap Konten Gacha pada Channel Youtube ‘windah Basudara,’” (Doctoral Diss. Univ. Islam Indones., 2023.
[4] D. Hariyanto, Buku ajar pengantar ilmu komunikasi. Umsida Press, 2021.
[5] O. B. Conmy, “Trash talk in a competitive setting: Impact on self-efficacy, affect, and performance,” Florida State Univ., 2008.
[6] Y. Kou, “oxic behaviors in team-based competitive gaming: The case of league of legends,” Proc. Annu. Symp. Comput. Interact. Play, pp. 81–92, 2020.
[7] M. Z. Zikrillah, A., Padiatra, A. M., Gunawan, I., Setiawan, B., & Muttaqin, “Perspektif Komunikaksi Islam Terhadap Perilaku Kekerasan Verbal Dalam Permainan Daring (Studi Kasus Game Mobile Legends: Bang Bang),” J. Dakwah Dan Komun., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 95–116, 2021.
[8] M. Irwin, S., Naweed, A., & Lastella, “Is is toxic? Banter? Or just talking shit? Applying the AACTT framework to understand trash talk behaviour in esports,” 2022.
[9] M. A. Romadlon, “Analisis Isi Trash Talking Pada Konten Game Online Mobile Legend Pada di Akun Youtube Brandon Kent,” Dr. Diss. Univ. Bhayangkara Surabaya, 2022.
[10] H. Maharani, L. O., & Hanafi, “Penggunaan Media Sosial Aplikasi Lita Dalam Membentuk Personal Branding Sebagai Gamers Wanita,” J. Ilmu Komun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2022.
[11] G. B. Hermayanthi, “Representasi Kekerasan Pada Anak dalam Film Miss Baek (Analisis Representasi Stuart Hall,” 2021.
[12] S. Hall, “The spectacle of the other. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices,” vol. 7, 1977.
[13] F. An Nur, “Representasi Pola Komunikasi Orang Tua Tunggal Pada Film Yang Tak Tergantikan,” Komuniti J. Komun. Dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 2022.
[14] P. A. R. Safira, H. V., & Dewi, “Representasi Maskulinitas dalam Film 27 Steps of May,” Commercium, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2020.
[15] A. Sefrandov, D., Luik, J. E., Yogatama, “Penerimaan Citra Windah Basudara oleh Penonton Pada Konten Charity di Youtube,” J. E-Komunikasi, vol. 10, 2022.
[16] G. G. Farisi, D. Al, & Sukendro, “Analisis Personal Branding di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus pada Channel YouTube Windah Basudara),” Prologia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 466–472, 2023.
[17] N. Kristiyono, J., & Dwi Hermawan, “Analisis Komunikasi Interaktif Brando Franco dengan Penontonnya dalam Live Streaming di Kanal YouTube Windah Basudara,” JCommsci - J. Media Commun. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 11–19, 2023.
[18] Y. Manullang, Y., Andrean, J., Efendy, R., Irfandi, A., & Dewanto, “Dampak Penggunaan Bahasa Youtuber Gaming Windah Basudara Terhadap Perilaku Anak Dibawah Umur,” vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1033–1039, 2023.
[19] H. Q. A’yun, “Kata Tabu dalam Video PUBG Indonesia Kebodohan Bermain Saat Karantina: Bentuk, Fungsi dan Penyebab,” J. Ugm, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2023.
[20] A. P. Sari, “Analisis Tekstual: Representasi Budaya Arek Dalam Film Yowis Ben 3,” Semin. Nas. Has. Skripsi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2022.
[21] S. Ullman, Pengantar Semiotik: Diadaptasi oleh Sumarsono. Yokyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.
[22] L. G. Andersson, Bad language. Blackwell by arrangement with Penguin Books, 1990.
[23] D. Rusmana, “Filsafat Semiotika: Paradigma, Teori, dan Metode Interpretasi Tanda,” Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2014.
[24] A. Wahidy, “Cerdas dan Cermat Berbahasa Cermin Pribadi Bangsa Bermartabat: Perilaku Santun Berbahasa,” J. Dosen Univ. PGRI Palembang, 2018.