Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development
Vol 14 No 2 (2023): June
Community Education Development Articles

5E-Based Flipped classroom Teaching Model Templates for STEM Education
Templat Model Pembelajaran Flipped classroom Berbasis 5E untuk Pendidikan STEM


Article View
  • Noly Shofiyah *,
  • Fitria Eka Wulandari,
  • Metatia Intan Mauliana,
  • Lailatul Maghfiroh
Noly Shofiyah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *
Fitria Eka Wulandari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Metatia Intan Mauliana
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Lailatul Maghfiroh
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v14i2.917
Published June 23, 2023
Keywords
  • 5E-Based Flipped classroom Teaching Model Templates,
  • STEM education,
  • validity,
  • reliability,
  • engagement
How to Cite
Shofiyah , N., Wulandari, F. E., Mauliana, M. I., & Maghfiroh, L. (2023). 5E-Based Flipped classroom Teaching Model Templates for STEM Education . Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijccd.v14i2.917

Copyright (c) 2023 FITRIA EKA WULANDARI, Noly Shofiyah , Metatia Intan Mauliana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of 5E-Based Flipped classroom  Teaching Model Templates for STEM education. The aim is to assess the validity and reliability of the model across its content and construct validity. The findings suggest that the 5E-Based Flipped classroom  Model for STEM Learning exhibits strong validity and reliability. The model is well-developed, supported by theory, effectively planned and implemented, and reliable in measuring the desired outcomes in STEM education. These results provide valuable insights for educators and researchers interested in adopting the 5E-Based Flipped classroom  Model for STEM Learning in their educational settings. By utilizing these templates, educators can enhance their teaching practices and facilitate engaging and effective learning experiences for students in STEM subjects. Researchers can also benefit from these findings to further investigate the impact and effectiveness of the model in different educational contexts. Overall, the 5E-Based Flipped classroom  Teaching Model Templates for STEM education offer a promising approach to foster student engagement, understanding, and achievement in STEM disciplines.

Highlights:

  • Validity and reliability assessment: The study evaluates the validity and reliability of the 5E-Based Flipped classroom Teaching Model Templates for STEM education, providing evidence of its strong validity and reliability.

  • Effective teaching and learning: The model is well-developed, supported by theory, and effectively planned and implemented, enhancing teaching practices and facilitating engaging and effective learning experiences for students in STEM subjects.

  • Potential for broader adoption and research: The findings offer valuable insights for educators and researchers interested in adopting the model, encouraging further investigation of its impact and effectiveness in different educational settings and contexts.

Keywords: 5E-Based Flipped classroom Teaching Model Templates, STEM education, validity, reliability, engagement.

Article View

References

  1. MA Honey, G. Pearson, dan H. Schweingruber, "Integrasi STEM dalam pendidikan K-12: status, prospek, dan agenda penelitian," STEM Integr. Pendidikan K-12. Status, Prospek. an Agenda Res., hlm. 1–165, 2014. doi: 10.17226/18612.
  2. P. Pimthong dan J. Williams, "Pemahaman guru preservice tentang pendidikan STEM," Kasetsart J. Soc. Sains, vol. 41, tidak. 2, hlm. 289–295, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.017.
  3. R. Weinhandl, Z. Lavicza, and T. Houghton, "Matematika dan pengembangan guru STEM untuk pendidikan terbalik," J. Res. Inovasi. Mengajar. Pelajari., vol. 13, tidak. 1, hlm. 3–25, 2020. doi: 10.1108/jrit-01-2020-0006.
  4. KH Lai dan HK Foon, "Untuk Menilai Efektivitas Gamified 5E Flipped Learning Platform dalam Mempromosikan Pembelajaran dan Prestasi Siswa dalam Fisika: Penelitian Berbasis Desain," hlm. 91–106, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981 -13- 6681-9_7.
  5. CH Fung, "Bagaimana Flipping Classroom Memupuk Pendidikan STEM: Studi Kasus Model FPD," Technol. Tahu. Pelajari., vol. 25, tidak. 3, hlm. 479–507, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09443-9.
  6. M. Lundin, A. Bergviken Rensfeldt, T. Hillman, A. Lantz-Andersson, and L. Peterson, "Dominasi pendidikan tinggi dan pengetahuan silo: refleksi sistematis penelitian kelas terbalik," Int. J.Pendidikan. Technol. Tinggi. Pendidikan, vol. 15, tidak. 1, 2018. doi: 10.1186/s41239-018-0101-6.
  7. YJ Dori, Z. Kohen, and B. Rizowy, "Matematika untuk Ilmu Komputer: Kelas Terbalik dengan Proyek Opsional," Eurasia J. Math. Sains. Technol. Pendidikan, vol. 16, tidak. 12, hlm. 1–20, 2020. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/9149.
  8. X. Gao and KF Hew, "Menuju Model Kelas Terbalik Berbasis 5E untuk Mengajar Berpikir Komputasi di Sekolah Dasar: Efek pada Berpikir Komputasi Siswa dan Kinerja Pemecahan Masalah," J. Educ. Komputer. Res., vol. 60, tidak. 2, hlm. 512–543, 2022. doi: 10.1177/07356331211037757.
  9. KF Hew, Y. Zhu, and CK Lo, "Merancang dan evaluasi program berdasarkan model kelas 5E-Flipped: Studi metode campuran dua kasus," vol. 843, Ojennus 2016. Springer Singapura. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0008-0_11.
  10. FW Lichtenthaler, J. Klotz, dan F.-J. Flath, "Studi tentang ketosa, 10. Asilasi dan karbamoilasi d-fruktosa: Turunan asiklik, furanoid, dan piranoid serta fitur konformasinya," Liebigs Annalen, vol. 1995, tidak. 12, hlm. 2069-2080, 1995.
  11. N. Suprapto, "Sikap siswa terhadap pendidikan STEM: Suara dari SMP Indonesia," J. Turkish Sci. Pendidikan, vol. 13, tidak. Edisi khusus, hlm. 75-87, 2016. doi: 10.12973/tused.10172a.
  12. B. Wahono, PL Lin, dan CY Chang, "Bukti efektivitas pemberlakuan STEM dalam hasil belajar siswa Asia," Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, tidak. 1, hlm. 1-18, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1.
  13. D. Triana, YU Anggraito, and S. Ridlo, "Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Perubahan Lingkungan Berbasis STEM-PjBL Terhadap Keterampilan 4C Siswa," Jise, vol. 9, tidak. 2, hlm. 181-187, 2020.
  14. B. Wibawa dan S. Kardipah, “Model Flipped-Blended untuk Pendidikan STEM untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Siswa,” Int. J.Eng. Technol., vol. 7, tidak. 2.29, hal. 1006, 2018. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.14298.
  15. S. Schallert, Z. Lavicza, and E. Vandervieren, "Penggabungan pendekatan kelas terbalik dengan model inkuiri 5E: Sebuah desain heuristik," Int. J.Matematika. Pendidikan Sains. Technol., vol. 53, tidak. 6, hlm. 1528-1545, 2022. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1831092.
  16. RD Puspitasari, K. Herlina, and A. Suyatna, "A Need Analysis of STEM-integrated Flipped Classroom E-module to Improve Critical Thinking Skills," Indones. J.Sci. Matematika. Pendidikan, vol. 3, tidak. 2, hlm. 178-184, 2020. doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6121.
  17. SJ Seage dan M. Turegun, “Efek blended learning pada Permintaan STEM siswa sekolah dasar," Int. J.Res. Pendidikan Sains, vol. 6, no. 1, hlm. 133-140, 2022. doi: 10.46328/ijres.v6i1.728.
  18. A. Latip, Y. Andriani, S. Purnamasari, and D. Abdurrahman, “Integrasi robot pendidikan dalam pembelajaran STEM untuk meningkatkan keterampilan kolaboratif siswa,” J. Phys. Konf. Ser., vol. 1663, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012052.
  19. A. Widayanti, A. Abdurrahman, dan A. Suyatna, "Materi Pembelajaran Fisika Masa Depan Berbasis Pendidikan STEM: Analisis Persepsi Guru dan Siswa," J. Phys. Konf. Ser., vol. 1155, tidak. 1, hlm. 0-9, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012021.
  20. G. Asiksoy dan F. Ozdamli, "Pendekatan Kelas Terbalik Berdasarkan Model Learning Cycle 5E - 5ELFA," Jurnal Pendidikan Kroasia, vol. 19, tidak. 4, hlm. 1131-1166, doi: 10.15516/cje.v19i4.2564.
  21. L. Thibaut et al., "Pendidikan STEM Terpadu: Tinjauan Sistematis Praktik Instruksional dalam Pendidikan Menengah," Eur. J. STEM Educ., vol. 3, tidak. 1, hlm. 1-12, doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/85525.
  22. H. Ruiz-Martin dan RW Bybee, "Prinsip-prinsip kognitif pembelajaran yang mendasari Model Instruksi 5E," Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 9, tidak. 1, doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z.
  23. JE Rafon dan VM Mistades, "Keterlibatan interaktif dalam gerakan rotasi melalui flipped classroom dan model instruksional 5e," Int. J.Inf. Teknologi Pendidikan., vol. 10, tidak. 12, hlm. 905-910, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.12.1477.
  24. A. Aspridanel, A. Abdurrahman, D. Lengkana, and T. Jalmo, "Flipped Classroom Terintegrasi STEM dalam Perspektif Guru: Mungkinkah Implementasinya dalam E-Modul Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Sistem?", Indones. J.Sci. Matematika. Pendidikan, vol. 5, tidak. 1, hlm. 43-52, doi: 10.24042/ijsme.v5i1.10663.
  25. MAA Bahtaji, "Peran pemaparan matematika dan sains terhadap pengaruh model pembelajaran 5e dalam konsep fisika," J. Balt. Sains. Pendidikan, vol. 20, tidak. 1, hlm. 10-20, doi: 10.33225/jbse/21.20.10.
  26. Parno, E. Supriana, L. Yuliati, AN Widarti, M. Ali, dan U. Azizah, "Pengaruh Learning Cycle 7E berbasis STEM terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa dalam kacamata," Int. J.Teknologi Terbaru. Eng., vol. 8, tidak. 2, Edisi Khusus 9, hlm. 761-769, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.B1158.0982S919.