Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): September
Community Education Development Articles

Accounting Treatment of Damaged Products in UMKM Production Cost Calculation: Perlakuan Akuntansi atas Produk Rusak dalam Perhitungan Biaya Produksi UMKM

Putri Maulidiah Khasanah
Program Studi Akuntansi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Sarwenda Biduri
Program Studi Akuntansi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Categories

Published 2025-09-12

Keywords

  • Damaged Products,
  • Cost Of Production,
  • UMKM Accounting,
  • Financial Records,
  • Village Enterprise

How to Cite

Accounting Treatment of Damaged Products in UMKM Production Cost Calculation: Perlakuan Akuntansi atas Produk Rusak dalam Perhitungan Biaya Produksi UMKM. (2025). Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.21070/rqfsnb68

Abstract

General Background: Accurate cost accounting is essential for small enterprises to determine reliable production costs and financial reports. Specific Background: Many rural UMKM still rely on simple daily cash records without following the accounting cycle, including in handling damaged products during production. Knowledge Gap: Limited understanding of proper accounting treatment for damaged goods causes miscalculation of cost of production and reduces the reliability of financial information for external use. Aim: This study examines how damaged products are treated in calculating the cost of production at Pia Karomah UMKM in Kampung Pia, Pasuruan. Results: Findings show that financial records are manual and limited to income–expense notes, damaged products are not recorded according to cost accounting procedures, and production costs are calculated only from visible expenses. Novelty: The study links damaged-product accounting practices with rural UMKM financial literacy within a village-based production center. Implications: Strengthening accounting knowledge through training and guidance is necessary to improve cost calculation accuracy and financial reporting practices among village UMKM.

References

  1. [1] E. Mardianti, T. Hermelinda, and P. Raflesia, “Penerapan Akuntansi Biaya Produk Rusak Untuk Penyajian Laporan Keuangan Pada Zasqia Cake Curup,” 2022, vol. 1, pp. 1–13.
  2. [2] S. Hermawan and M. S. Amirullah, Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2016.
  3. [3] M. Muhtarudin and T. Sulastri, “Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Rusak Dalam Menentukan Harga Pokok Produksi (Studi Kasus Penentuan Biaya Produksi di Kawasan Sentra Industri Sepatu Cibaduyut Kota Bandung),” Jurnal Ilmiah MEA, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2019, doi: 10.31955/mea.vol3.iss1.pp81-95.
  4. [4] H. Hardani et al., Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV. Pustaka Ilmu, 2020.
  5. [5] H. Savitri, “Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Rusak Dalam Menetapkan Harga Pokok Produksi Pada CV Swada Karya Cemerlang Gresik,” 2020.
  6. [6] D. M. I. P. Pratiwi, “Perlakuan Akuntansi Terhadap Produk Rusak dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi Pada PT Jatim Taman Steel MFG Sidoarjo,” Journal of Sustainable Business Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 143–148, 2020.
  7. [7] F. Zahro, “Khofifah Ingin Viralkan Kampung Pia di Kejapanan, Kuatkan Branding dan Permodalan UKM,” Tribun News Surabaya, 2018.
  8. [8] C. P. Karouw, J. J. Tinangon, and N. Budiarso, “Perlakuan Akuntansi Terhadap Produk Rusak Dalam Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produk Pada CV Pulau Siau,” Jurnal EMBA, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1551–1561, 2016.
  9. [9] M. A. Nasution, M. N. Afif, and I. C. Kusuma, “Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Rusak Dalam Penentuan Harga Pokok Produksi PT Milko Beverage Industry,” 2024.
  10. [10] D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
  11. [11] R. Arinda, “Perlakuan Produk Rusak Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi,” JSMBI (Jurnal Sains Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2019.
  12. [12] N. Weti, “Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Rusak Pada PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk Pekanbaru,” 2016.
  13. [13] Misnawati, “Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Cacat Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi Pada CV Annisa,” 2018.
  14. [14] R. V. Pateh, G. B. Nangoi, and V. Z. Tirayoh, “Peran Quality Control dan Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Rusak,” Jurnal EMBA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 2017.
  15. [15] S. Unde, S. B. W. Thalib, and H. Reo, “Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Cacat Dalam Menghitung Harga Pokok Produksi (Studi Kasus Pada Bumdes Pelita Hidup Coklat Kobar Desa),” 2020.
  16. [16] D. Zuhro, “Perlakuan Akuntansi Produk Cacat dan Produk Rusak Pada PT EPI di Surabaya,” vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  17. [17] N. Zahirudin, A. Mahsyad, and S. Rosyafah, “Analisis Perlakuan Akuntansi Terhadap Produk Rusak Dalam Penetapan Harga Pokok Produksi Pada UD Karya Jaya Waru Sidoarjo,” pp. 141–156, 2016.